“Can We Do Dog Today?” How Happy Letters Found Its Place in a First-Grade Classroom
Tara Robinson added Happy Letters to an already-full literacy block to give beginning readers additional step-by-step support while she worked with her small groups.
After nineteen years in the classroom, Tara Robinson knew how much had to fit into a first-grade literacy block. Last year, she had thirteen students and about an hour a day for her district’s core program, small group work, digital practice, and decodable readers.
After nineteen years in the classroom, Tara Robinson knew how much had to fit into a first-grade literacy block. Last year, she had thirteen students and about an hour a day for her district’s core program, small group work, digital practice, and decodable readers.
Each piece was an important part of the puzzle, but Tara wanted one more layer of support designed for beginning readers, with clear navigation and enough guidance built into each task for students to keep working with less in-the-moment help.
Happy Letters was what she had been looking for. It could guide one group through foundational reading practice while Tara gave direct, responsive instruction to another group at her table.
From fifteen minutes to two paws
What stood out to Tara was how Happy Letters broke down the work when students got stuck. Audio instructions and visual cues showed them what to do, while immediate feedback helped them try again after a mistake.
At first, Tara ran Happy Letters like any other station: work on the activity for fifteen minutes, then switch. However, she soon found that a completion goal worked better. Students move along a path marked in paws, so she began by asking them to complete two.
The “two paws” completion rule was a guideline, not a fixed rule. Afterwards, Tara checked what each student had completed, what skill they were working on, and how long it took. “It depended on the skill, and on the kid.”Two paws gave the station a clear stopping point that the students could manage themselves.

A balanced weekly routine
The district-provided reading platform was already part of Tara’s schedule. She found room for Happy Letters by alternating the two programs and giving Happy Letters two fixed days each week. Soon, the students came in the door asking, “Can we do dog today?”
The mix gave students variety in how they practiced while maintaining each resource’s clear role in the early literacy curriculum. Happy Letters added consistent, age-appropriate guided practice in foundational reading alongside Tara’s small-group instruction and the rest of her literacy routine.
“We did that on Happy!”
Now, what students practice independently often returns to Tara’s teacher-led lessons. Students often say, “We did that on Happy!” When a sound pattern Tara teaches through Secret Stories also appears in Happy Letters, students tend to recognize the connection. “They’re getting it in multiple ways—different stories, different explanations of why something says what it says.”
The themed worlds have also become part of the classroom conversation. “It was like a challenge: ‘Oh, I’m in this world—are you in this world yet?’ They’re six, so they love to share everything they learn.”
A year later: more confident learners
After a year of consistent use, what Tara noticed was simple: “I noticed they get more confident.” At the teacher table, she sees it in what students recall and in how willing they are to try again.
Happy Letters began as the additional support Tara needed. A year later, it has earned a steady place in her literacy block, and she would like to see the program continue to grow.
Try Happy Letters in your literacy routine
Happy Letters is a K–2 foundational-literacy curriculum supplement, available to PK–3 classrooms and built on the Science of Reading principles. It is designed for independent practice with audio guidance and immediate feedback.
Add Happy Letters to your class and try Tara’s approach: start with two fixed days of usage and a small completion goal.
Tara Robinson teaches first grade at Allen Middle School, Illinois. Interviewed June 23, 2026, and published with her consent.
